Editorial Standards

Corrections

To report an error, use the contact form. Include the page URL, the statement or figure, and a supporting source where possible.

13 September 2026: removed unsupported personal background, funding and editorial-review claims, and response-time promises. Two seeded sample round commentaries were withdrawn because they presented unverified analysis and false review attribution as published commentary.

AI assistance

AI has been used to help create and revise site content and code, including guides and calculator explanations. Author attribution identifies the person behind COEkaki; it does not certify that every sentence was personally written or reviewed by the author.

• Round commentary drafts: the draft generator builds text and tables from stored bidding results. Unresolved draft placeholders block publication; removing placeholders alone does not establish factual accuracy or personal review.
• Archive year summaries — AI-generated, not line-edited: these describe the stored historical results. Compare a summary with its accompanying data table and source information.

Automated checks can detect some inconsistencies, but they do not prove every explanation or interpretation correct. If something appears wrong, please use the corrections process.

Sources and assumptions

Refer to the methodology and source links alongside the content. Historical results retain their exercise dates. Calculator examples use assumptions; they are not supplier quotations.

The Quota Outlook shows supply scenarios. The Bid Advisor describes recent bidding conditions. Neither establishes a future premium or a recommendation to bid.

Citing COEkaki

Link to the specific result, article or calculator, and include the exercise date or the inputs used. For the Weighted Premium Index, include the reading date and its stated methodology.

For questions about content, use the contact form.